Merri Solar Panel Research Project: Report 24 (26th July 2009)


As per prevous reports, households are identified by initials – number of panels – tilt angle - orientation (e.g. SP-6-37-N = Simon Pockley - 6 panels - 37o – North).  [NB. To print - use Landscape format]. Graph #1 shows whole of system outputs beside the total number of generating hours for the last 12 months. The differences between the total generating hours is less that 7% and between kWh generated clearly aligned with size of system (number of panels).

 

 

Graph #1. 12 month comparison of whole of system output (ranked by tilt angle)

 

Graph #2 normalises the kWh output by providing kWh output per panel. Tilt angle is barely significant in as far as there is a difference of only 9.19% (20kWh) between the highest and lowest output (CK and SP). However, the highest overall output is at latitude (37.5 degrees). As expected, we have seen the shallow tilt angles race ahead of the steeper tilts in summer and fall back in winter. While output has been impacted by shade, location is clearly (curiously) a factor in that the 3 highest outputs (MG,TD, SP) are next door to each other and have quite different tilt angles.


Graph #2. 12 month comparison of kWh output per panel (ranked by tilt angle)

 

Graph #3 shows the average number of hours per day that the inverters turned themselves on and generated power over the 12 months between 13th July 2008 – 13th July 2009. The curve follows the expected patterns of seasonal day length. It is interesting to compare this with the variable outputs in Graph #4.

 

 

Graph #3. Comparison of average daily generating hours measured per fortnight over 12 months.

 

Graph #4 shows the extent to which factors such as heat, dust and cloud have impacted on the seasonal kWh output of all the systems.

 

 

Graph #4. Comparison of all KWh output per panel over 12 months.


Graph #5 shows the seasonal rate of conversion of the available solar energy. Available solar energy is taken from the Bureau of Meteorology’s Melbourne figures collected at the airport. The cooler seasons appear favour conversion efficiency. Our top reading was 18.31% (SP in June 2009) and out bottom reading was 8.23% (DC in December 2008).

 

 

Graph #5. Comparison of monthly rates of conversion of the available solar energy